Green Boondoggles

A barrage of news headlines on the [2]Solyndra scandal continue to remind us
that President Obama made green jobs one of his administration’s priorities.
Those headlines also reveal this initiative to have been a costly mistake.

The bankruptcy of Solyndra, the solar-panel manufacturer that has collapsed
despite receiving half a billion dollars from the federal government, is only
the tip of the iceberg. The Wall Street Journal recently reported that several
other green companies that received generous federal aid are teetering on the
brink.

Ener1, whose subsidiary EnerDel received a $118 million federal grant, lost
$165 million in fiscal 2010 and has dim prospects. According to the Journal,
Ener1 had "lost its bid to supply batteries to Fisker Automotive, a
battery-powered car maker which received a $529 million U.S. taxpayer-backed
federal loan guarantee in 2010," when "Fisker chose to buy its batteries from a
company called A123 Systems, itself the recipient of a $249 million U.S.
Department of Energy grant."

Great! First Team Obama extends taxpayer dollars to green companies, then it
torpedoes them by giving larger grants to their competitors. Meanwhile, Fisker,
itself a recipient of over a half-billion dollar handout from Uncle Sam, is
making its cars in Finland.

Team Obama’s record on creating green jobs is no more confidence-inspiring than
its record in midwifing a viable electric car industry.

A recent study by the Labor Department’s Inspector General examined what became
of $162.8 million of Obama stimulus money funneled to the Employment and
Training Administration. Set up to "train and prepare individuals for careers
in ‘green jobs,’" the score is this: 53,000 individuals were trained, 8,035 got
jobs, and only 1,033 trainees still held those jobs after six months.

There are at least four important reasons why we should stop funding "green"
government programs:

First lesson: government-appointed experts are incompetent economic planners—a
fact of life that any intelligent adult should know after the spectacular
failure of central economic planning in the socialist experiments of the 20th
century. No matter how brilliant and how well-intentioned government planners
may be, they do not and cannot know what consumers want and how much they are
willing to pay for it. Only free markets can solve this challenge. If electric
cars are to be a viable industry, private companies will make them so.

Second lesson: The government’s involvement in Solyndra raises troubling
questions about possible corruption. While I think the Solyndra deal stinks to
high heaven, I wonder whether any laws have been broken. Where is the dividing
line between influence peddling, legitimate lobbying, political deal-making,
and actual crime? Many farm-state Republicans have supported the uneconomical
ethanol boondoggle for decades in exchange for generous support of their
electoral campaigns, so the practice is bipartisan.

Third lesson: Government job programs are a blatant failure. They have never
been economically beneficial. In the 1930s, Franklin Delano Roosevelt had the
department of agriculture hire 100,000 Americans to monitor how much acreage
American farmers were cultivating. These federal jobs produced no wealth. Their
jobs made no more economic sense than paying people to dig holes and then fill
them up.

Today’s green workers are economically nonsensical, too. True, they sometimes
produce something, but the economic value is invariably less than the amount of
tax dollars needed to subsidize their job. In other words, federal jobs make us
poorer.

Fourth lesson: Finally, we simply can’t afford these green boondoggles. Uncle
Sam’s official debt is now $15 trillion, and when you include off-budget items
and unfunded liabilities, the situation is far worse. Given this fiscal
reality, it is the height of irresponsibility to throw taxpayer dollars at any
special interests, and it is particularly egregious to subsidize enterprises
that are plainly uneconomical.

I am not opposed to green industries. What we need is for the government to get
out of the way and let green technologies prove themselves in the competitive
marketplace. It’s time for change and an end to economic foolishness. Let’s get
the burden of green boondoggles off the taxpayers’ back.

— Dr. Mark W. Hendrickson is an adjunct faculty member, economist, and fellow
for economic and social policy with [3]The Center for Vision & Values at Grove
City College.

[4]www.VisionAndValues.org | [5]www.VisionAndValuesEvents.com

References

1. http://www.visionandvalues.org/2011/11/green-fiascoes-and-boondoggles/
2. http://www.visionandvalues.org/2011/10/its-not-easy-subsidizing-green/
3. http://www.visionandvalues.org/
4. http://www.VisionAndValues.org/
5. http://www.VisionAndValuesEvents.com/
This message was sent by: Grove City College, 100 Campus Drive, Grove City, PA 16127