It was a shocker. And it grabbed headlines, not just in Pennsylvania but
across the nation. Governor Tom Corbett in an abrupt turnabout is suing the
NCAA for sanctions imposed on Penn State University in the notorious
But how should we interpret Corbett's now widely reported intentions? Are
they the brilliant political strategy of a governor determined to right a
wrong and defend his state against the bullying tactics of an out of control
regulatory body? Or are they the desperate flailing of an embattled governor
feverishly trying to rescue his own career from a political defeat some
Certainly many political observers see cynical political calculations
working here, a none too subtle attempt by an unpopular governor to shore up
his political strength in advance of a 2014 re-election certain to be
challenging for him. A chorus of critics have characterized the planned suit
as "frivolous," "grandstanding," "a disgrace," and "laughable."
Moreover, Corbett's own previous involvement in the case is controversial.
Critics have long accused him of dragging his feet as attorney general in
the early Sandusky investigation to benefit his gubernatorial candidacy.
Then last July after the NCAA sanctions were announced, he publicly
supported them, calling them necessary "corrective actions" for Penn State.
Corbett's new position puts him squarely on both sides of the issue, leaving
little doubt that political calculations are in play. Beyond dispute, the
governor's anemic approval ratings stem in part from his handling of the
prosecution and his later role as an ex officio member of the Penn State
Board of Trustees.
Statewide polls have consistently shown high disapproval ratings for Corbett's
management of the case, as well as deep unpopularity for the NCAA sanctions
themselves. According to a September F&M poll only one in six (17%)
registered voters believe Governor Corbett did an excellent or good job of
investigating the Sandusky case when he was the attorney general compared to
nearly two in three (65%) who think he did a fair or poor job.
But there is another side to consider. In the same poll a clear majority of
voters (54%) believe the NCAA sanctions imposed are unfair. Pennsylvanian's
agree with the governor that the NCAA blatantly overstepped its bounds,
ignored its own procedures and denied Penn State due process. Legal
observers disagree in evaluating the suit, some concluding it will be a hard
case to win, while others believe there are significant antitrust issues
raised in Corbett's arguments.
Surely Corbett's arguments are familiar since they comprise many of the same
criticisms many Pennsylvanians have leveled at the NCAA sanctions since last
year. Corbett's 43 page lawsuit filed in the U S District Court charges
. The NCAA is a "trade organization" that overstepped its authority
involving itself in a criminal case. In imposing sanctions on Penn State the
NCAA ignored its own procedures and guidelines.
. NCAA virtually blackmailed Penn State into accepting the sanctions
without due process by threatening to suspend the football program
permanently (the "death penalty").
. The NCAA "has punished Penn State without citing a single concrete NCAA
rule that Penn State has broken.and with a complete disregard for the NCAA's
own enforcement procedures."
. The NCAA penalties have imposed "irreparable damage on Pennsylvania, on
its businesses and reputation, and on the Penn State football team.
Whether one endorses these arguments or not, many fair minded people will
agree that most of them should have been aired when sanctions were imposed.
Corbett's law suit, better late than never, will do that.
The stakes for Corbett in this bold strategy are immense. In going after the
sanctions and the NCAA, he is adopting a politically popular policy. At the
same time he risks the credible criticism that he is a hypocritical
politician who initially supported the NCAA actions as necessary "corrective
actions," but now is changing course because he is in political trouble.
Furthermore, suing the NCAA puts the case squarely into the 2014
gubernatorial campaign, a strategy with some significant plusses and minuses
All in all, Corbett's action seems to be an instance of doing the right
thing for the wrong reason. In defending the state's rights against what
many believe to be an out of control trade group, Corbett is exercising the
leadership expected of the state's chief executive. But he is doing it
belatedly and perhaps reluctantly. For Pennsylvanians, a measured review of
the correctness and proportionality of the NCAA sanctions is a necessary, if
painful, exercise. For Pennsylvania's governor it may also be a necessary,
if painful, exercise - and one fraught with potential political peril.
follow on Twitter | friend on Facebook | forward to a friend
Copyright © 2013- G. Terry Madonna and Michael L. Young, All rights reserved
Our mailing address is:
Center for Politics and Public Affairs
415 Harrisburg Ave
Lancaster, PA 17603
Phone: 717.291.4052 Follow Madonna, Young and other political writers at The Political Express.