Obama: A Whole Lot of Nothing

Member Group : Jerry Shenk

This article first appeared in the [i]American Thinker[ei]

That was then; this is now: Now America is facing a sovereign debt crisis
caused by excessive government borrowing and spending, exacerbated by a
recession and by actuary-confirmed, financially unsustainable commitments to

The failure of government to budget and spend responsibly isn’t a Democratic
or Republican issue. American politicians have taxed, borrowed and spent
far too much money. It’s irrational and purely ideological for progressives
who support Obama to use what they see as Bush administration shortcomings
to excuse or defend even greater excesses by the current president and his
Democratic congressional allies.

America is about to reach a debt ceiling with an administration-applied
deadline of August 2. The president says there will be "fiscal Armageddon"
if Congress doesn’t act to raise the debt limit. So, with the clock ticking
down, what is the president’s plan to reduce spending? He has

Regardless, on July 19, 2011, House Republicans gave the president the debt
ceiling increase and political cover he wanted. As part of a "
<http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c112:H.R.2560:> Cut, Cap, and
Balance&quot; bill (CCB), the House authorized raising the debt limit by the $2.5
trillion Obama requested to see him through the 2012 election. Enacted in
the absence of administration leadership, CCB has some modest strings

The new debt ceiling would only be effective if a two-thirds majority in
both Houses of Congress passes a balanced-budget amendment to the
Constitution and sends it to the states for eventual ratification or
rejection. CCB also calls for a minimal $111 billion in spending cuts in
FY2012, only $1.5 trillion in cuts over the next ten years, and firm caps on
federal spending at roughly 19 percent of GDP by 2020. The $1.5 trillion in
cuts over the remainder of the decade is less than the government will
borrow this year.

The CCB bill punts on entitlements, proposing no immediate changes to our
largest fiscal problems: Medicare, Medicaid, and Social Security. CCB is a
major concession by House Republicans, especially by those sent to
Washington following the grassroots-influenced wave election of 2010.
President Obama has vowed to veto the bill if it passes the Senate. Obama’s
alternative to CCB is…nothing.

Obama has given speeches and held press conferences to declare his
willingness to &quot;make difficult choices,&quot; but he has never enumerated a
single compromise, reform or &quot;difficult choice.&quot; Obama has

In a recent press conference, Obama was asked what Medicare reforms he’d
accept. He responded, &quot;There’s lots of options on the table,&quot; but refused
to be more specific. Obama answered…nothing.

A FY-2012 budget was passed by the Republican House of Representatives. The
president has rejected it, but, as an alternative, he has offered…nothing.

To be fair, the president did deliver a rambling, detail-free &quot;budget&quot;
speech in May on which Douglas Elmendorf, the Democrat who is director of
the Congressional Budget Office, commented, &quot;We don’t score speeches.&quot;
Translation: &quot;The president offered…nothing.&quot;

It’s true that earlier Republican majorities failed to act, but the
Democratic Party which held the White House and majorities in both Houses of
Congress from January 2009-January 2011 (and which still controls the Senate
and White House) has failed monumentally. Not only have Washington
Democrats increased the debt by more than $5 trillion in three years, they
haven’t produced a budget in more than two years. Though they have paid lip
service to deficit reduction, other than tax increases, Democrats have

National politicians have ensured that every child born here today is
already nearly $50,000 in debt, money that must be taken from wages none
will begin earning for two decades or more — debt that increases and
compounds relentlessly. Absent constitutional requirements to balance
budgets or fix spending caps, our system doesn’t self-correct. If it must
rely on politicians to correct the problems they caused, America may be

It has become very clear. The president has nothing to offer that will make
him or his party fiscally responsible or our nation financially sound.
President Obama and his liberal enablers in the Democratic Party, unions,
the media and the academy only want to borrow and spend more, and they want
tax hikes to pay for new spending and debt service.

But, in March, 2006, during Bush 43’s second term, speaking from the floor
of the US Senate, then-Senator Obama
t-ceiling-katrina-trinko> said:

The fact that we are here today to debate raising America’s debt limit is a
sign of leadership failure. It is a sign that the US Government cannot pay
its own bills. It is a sign that we now depend on ongoing financial
assistance from foreign countries to finance our Government’s reckless
fiscal policies. Increasing America’s debt weakens us domestically and
internationally. Leadership means that, &quot;the buck stops here.’ Instead,
Washington is shifting the burden of bad choices today onto the backs of our
children and grandchildren. America has a debt problem and a failure of
leadership. Americans deserve better.

Senator Obama’s statement is more true now than it was then.

Jerry Shenk is co-editor of the Rebuilding America, Federalist Papers 2
websiteC: <http://www.federalistpapers2.org/> www.federalistpapers2.org.

Page Printed from:
at July 23, 2011 – 05:21:54 AM CDT