Workersâ€™ Comp Reform Needed to Help Injured Workers and End Trial Lawyer Scam
State Rep. Ryan Mackenzie (R-Berks) suspected something sinister at work when the trial bar targeted him with a negative ad campaign over his legislation, HB 18, which creates a drug formulary for injured workers. The campaign was venomous even by the usual trial bar standards.
It turns out the attack campaign was a pre-emptive strike aimed at protecting a racket involving a cabal of lawyers and their pet doctors whose financial interests in a pharmacy made them rich at the expense of injured workers and their employers. The ugly details of the scandal were laid out in a Philadelphia Inquirer investigative report published on September 22.
In short, the lawyers would refer injured workers to doctors who would prescribe everyday creams and ointments, available over-the-counter for $60 or $70, from their pharmacies at exorbitant prices â€" some costing $8,000 per tube. The moneymaking conflict of interest was complete with the cost of the â€œmedicineâ€ inflating final settlements amounts under the workersâ€™ compensation system.
â€œThe insurance carriers usually stopped covering the costs of the ointments fairly early in the treatments,â€ Mackenzie said. â€œBut the doctors would keep prescribing them and then tell the workers not to bother paying. The cost to cover all the prescriptions would be cited by the lawyers and become part of a final settlement agreement.â€
PMA President David N. Taylor said that the scam is another tragic example how the litigation industry is corruptly exploiting the system at the expense of everyone else. â€œYet again, the trial lawyers are looting a program intended to help vulnerable people, causing injured workers to suffer longer than they should and making employers overpay for a system that is costlier than it should be.â€
Rep. Mackenzie sponsored HB 18 to establish an evidence-based formulary that would help workers complete their treatments and get off their medications, which for some was leading to opioid addictions, and get them back to work as quickly as possible.
â€œWe are in the top three states for not only the number of prescriptions handed out to injured workers but the length of duration of those prescriptions,â€ Mackenzie said. â€œStates with formularies (New York, Texas, California and Ohio among them) get their workers off the drugs and back to work in some instances in nearly half the time.â€
Ohio, for example, implemented its formulary in 2011, and in just three years the number of workers compensation patients considered opioid dependent, was reduced by half.
To prevent future scams, Mackenzie has prepared an amendment to HB 18 that would forbid a lawyer from referring a client to a health care provider who would prescribe treatment or prescription drugs at a health care facility or pharmacy in which the lawyer holds a direct or indirect ownership interest.
Carrying the trial lawyersâ€™ water, some lawmakers have filed amendments that would effectively gut the bill.
The business community has mounted a campaign of its own, one supported by the PMA, the Pennsylvania Chamber of Business and Industry, the National Federal of Independent Business, and over a dozen other business, government and health care groups.
â€œThis relationship between lawyers, doctors and pharmacies is wrong,â€œ said Gene Barr, President and CEO of the Chamber. â€œBut even more disturbing is the lengths theyâ€™ve gone to oppose good legislation that would build on the work of the legislature and Governor to combat this tragic prescription drug and opioid epidemic.â€
HB 18 was set for a floor vote in mid-June but a procedural motion led by Rep. Gene DiGirolamo, (R-Bucks), sent the bill to the Rules Committee, where it awaits action.
To be sure, the scandal laid out in the Inquirer story will help the billâ€™s chances â€" as Mackenzie said â€œthey (trial bar) shot themselves in the foot this time.â€
But it doesnâ€™t end there. The lawyer/doctor racket prompted Liberty Mutual Insurance to file a lawsuit on September 14 in Philadelphia Common Pleas Court, alleging that 18 doctors in the Philadelphia area were sending injured workers to pharmacies that would then bill carriers for â€œvast quantitiesâ€ of compounded pain creams at inflated prices.
A follow-up Inquirer story published on September 30 says that suit alleges the doctors and pharmacists formed â€œillegal, collusive relationshipsâ€ that exploited weaknesses in Pennsylvaniaâ€™s workersâ€™ comp system. It contends they created and prescribed compounded creams that are not included in the systemâ€™s fee schedule, leading to â€œhighly inflatedâ€ bills of $5,000 to $8,000 per tube of cream.
The story goes on: â€œLiberty Mutual also alleges that compounded creams were not tailored to individual patients, but rather â€˜manufactured in batches,â€™ in violation of Food and Drug Administration regulations. Many medical experts say there is little evidence that such creams are safe or effective.â€
Thereâ€™s nothing to dislike about HB 18: it would help prevent opioid addictions, get injured workers back on the job more quickly, reduce costs in the workersâ€™ compensation system, and put an end to a greedy practice designed to make a few chiselers rich at the expense and health of others.
Chevron, Peoples Natural Gas Throw Weight Behind Growing Pennsylvania Economy
American Fracking Undermines Authoritarians
PA manufacturing in spotlight/Recovery successes
Don’t miss any new episodes of PMA Perspective
Phone: (717) 232-0737 | 225 State Street, Harrisburg, PA 17101
Facebook â€¢ Twitter
PMA Bulletin Â© 2017 All Rights Reserved